PayoutMalta18+

Wagering Requirements Explained: What the Multiplier Multiplies

Wagering requirements are the mechanism that keeps a bonus from being cash. Before the bonus balance, and anything won with it, can leave the account, a set volume of stakes has to pass through it. That volume is advertised as a multiplier — 30×, 35×, 40×. Three other clauses decide what the multiplier is worth in euros, and two of them move the figure further than the headline number ever does: the phrase naming what gets multiplied, the grid setting how much each game counts, and the ceiling on a single bet. This page takes them in the order they change the answer.

1. The multiplier — and 2. what it multiplies

Two numbers make a wagering requirement, and only one of them reaches the banner.

Take the multiplier alone first. Forty over thirty-five is a seventh more stakes: real money, and the smallest of the moves described on this page. The second number is the base — the phrase sitting immediately after the multiplier in the terms, either the bonus amount or your deposit and bonus. On a 100% match that phrase doubles the requirement. On a 50% match it triples it, because a deposit buying half its own size in bonus funds is twice the bonus, and both go into the base.

Worked on a €250 deposit matched 100%, so a €250 bonus. Rows are ordered by the stakes they produce, lowest first, which is a sort on the arithmetic and carries no view about which wording an operator should use.

What the terms say Base Stakes owed
35× the bonus €250 €8,750
40× the bonus €250 €10,000
50× the bonus €250 €12,500
35× the deposit and bonus €500 €17,500

The fourth row is the point of the table. A 50× requirement written against the bonus is lighter work than a 35× one written against deposit and bonus — €12,500 of stakes against €17,500 — so sorting offers by the headline multiplier sorts them by the wrong number.

Those four rows are arithmetic on a hypothetical, printed because the search asks for 35× and 40× in money. One offer on our record does publish 35× — Decode Casino’s no-deposit spins roll what the spins win 35 times, a winnings base with no deposit or bonus sum under it, priced on no deposit bonuses. Every deposit-offer multiplier we have read attaches to the bonus alone; the deposit-and-bonus base appears on none of the six deposit offers we hold. That is a statement about five readings, and only three of those offers print a multiplier for the sentence to be about. The market runs wider than our record and we have surveyed no part of the rest.

The other two print none, and the reasons are opposite rather than shared. BC.Game’s is a monthly rakeback: the balance is locked and unlocks in real time as you wager, which is a described mechanism rather than a missing one — it is simply not a turnover multiple, so there is nothing for one to be quoted against.

Betway’s, read on 13 August 2026, is a cashback, and it is worth taking slowly on the page about what the multiplier multiplies. A deposit match names a sum first: the bonus is credited, and the requirement is that sum times a number, fixed before the first spin. A cashback names a percentage and a window instead — 30% of net casino losses across the first 24 hours after the first deposit — and the amount is whatever your own play leaves behind once that window has closed. So there is no sum in place at the outset for a multiplier to act on. Hence no multiplier in the terms, and no phrase after one naming a base: the two numbers this page opens with have no operands here. The offer states no game weighting either, and our record holds no maximum bet for it in either direction, so it cannot be entered in the table above and cannot be set against the four that do publish a multiplier.

That is worth naming precisely, because it is the commonest misreading a terms page invites. A requirement you cannot find is not a requirement of zero. The offer publishes no figure, which leaves the question open rather than answered in your favour, and the distance between those two readings is the whole of what you might owe. An offer we cannot price is not an offer we have priced at nothing.

One thing the percentage and the window do not settle is what the returned money is by the time it reaches the account — cash you can withdraw, or a balance carrying conditions of its own. Our record does not hold it. That gap is the same kind as the maximum bet below: a question we have not put to the full terms rather than a silence we have found in them. It is also the clause this page exists to explain, so it is named here rather than assumed away.

3. Game weighting — the silent multiplier

The multiplier and its base give you a turnover figure. Weighting decides how quickly your stakes retire it, and it works as a divisor.

A contribution grid is a rate of exchange. A row at 100% means one euro staked moves the counter by one euro. A row at 10% means ten euro staked moves it by one. A row at 5% means twenty. Nothing about the requirement itself has changed; the same figure now takes twenty times the volume to reach, on the game class many people choose precisely because it looks cheaper to play.

Two grids sit on our record and they differ line by line. BitStarz puts slots at 100% and table, live, instant-win, lottery and bingo games at 5%, with progressive jackpot and accumulating-mechanic games excluded and the exclusion list described in its own terms as dynamic. 888casino puts slots, scratch cards and keno at 100%, poker variants at 20%, blackjack, roulette, baccarat and live casino at 10%, and craps at 5%. NetBet’s welcome page stated no grid on the day we read it, BC.Game’s record holds none, and Betway’s offer states no game weighting while describing itself as covering all casino and live-casino games — which says which games the promotion applies to, not the rate at which any of them counts. For those three the question is open in both directions, and an empty cell here means unread, never zero.

The zero rows deserve a separate reading, because our record carries them in two different wordings. 888casino’s offer states that the promotion is not valid on Live Baccarat or Live Roulette, and, in the same clause, that progressive-jackpot play does not count towards it. BitStarz excludes progressive jackpot and accumulating-mechanic games. The two wordings do different things. A row at 0% means your stakes are placed and simply do not move the counter — no volume of play on that game will ever clear the requirement, so it is a wall rather than a slow lane. “Not valid on” is a stronger statement again: it says the promotion does not apply to that game, and neither document we hold says what the operator does if the game is played while a bonus is running. That is a question for support before the first spin, while the answer still changes what you do.

Weighting and a game’s published RTP are separate axes: one sets how fast the counter fills, the other what the stakes cost while it does — how to read an RTP figure (cross-silo — logged exception).

Both grids came off the operators’ own pages, opened on a Malta connection whose geography the owner confirmed to us on 28 July 2026: 888casino’s welcome page on 16 July 2026, and the BitStarz offer entry captured on 10 July 2026. The numbered clauses quoted further down have a different provenance again — BitStarz’s bonus terms dated 25 June 2025, a document supplied to us in full, carrying no capture geography whatsoever. The fifth offer arrived on a third footing: Betway’s Malta welcome-offer terms, read on 13 August 2026, with the jurisdiction confirmed on the operator’s own content endpoint rather than by a capture from a Malta connection. Operator-stated is as high as any bonus fact on this site currently reaches. We have never held one of these five bonuses on an account of our own, and every dated reading sits beside its headline on the casino bonus offers, priced in euros.

4. The maximum bet — the clause outside the arithmetic

The first three numbers price a requirement. This one can cancel it.

While a bonus is running, the terms commonly cap what may be staked on a single spin or hand. Two of the six offers on our record publish such a cap, and both land on the same figure. No calculator carries a field for it either way, because it does not adjust the total — it can only end the thing being totalled.

BitStarz sets €5 while a bonus is active, and its bonus terms extend the same €5 to double-up wagers and bonus-buy features. No clause number for that cap appears in the text we hold, so none is printed here, and nothing we hold says what breaching it costs.

NetBet sets €5 too — or €0.50 a line on slots, the same ceiling expressed per line — and it is the only offer on our record that answers the second question. A stake above it can forfeit the entire bonus balance and every winning accumulated on it. That reaches us through the operator’s irregular-play terms as the owner read them on 30 July 2026, not as a clause we opened: NetBet’s welcome-bonus page prints no maximum bet at all, and the site refuses automated requests. It is worth knowing where that figure was found. An offer page saying nothing about a maximum bet is not an operator that has none.

888casino states no figure across two readings of its offer terms and its bonus policy. BC.Game has no fixed low cap to state: its bonus is a locked balance that unlocks as you wager rather than a multiplier to grind, so no per-spin ceiling is policing one. Betway is a blank of a third kind, and a thinner one: our record carries no maximum-bet figure for the cashback and no note saying the offer states none — not an operator we have found publishing nothing, just a question we have not put to the terms. An unread ceiling is still the first thing worth hunting for in the full bonus terms, because an autoplay stake respects a number you have read and nothing else.

Two neighbouring clauses in the same BitStarz document decide what counts as a qualifying bet at all. Minimal-risk bets are excluded from the requirement (§3.18). The document does not define the term; in practice it targets stakes arranged to cover most outcomes, which would otherwise retire turnover without risking it. And a bonus can end without any mistake on your part: the same terms forfeit it once the balance falls below $0.10 (§3.25), in the document’s own currency. The rest of the fine print has a checklist of its own on the bonus traps page.

What accepting a bonus does to money you already own

A bonus is normally described as an addition. On one of the terms documents we hold it is also a condition attached to the deposit that triggered it: BitStarz states the deposit is locked while an accepted bonus is running, and that cancelling the bonus or letting it expire forfeits the bonus together with the winnings attributed to it (§3.22). Its welcome package runs 7 days, across 4 deposit legs that each carry their own 40× on the bonus sum.

The reader-facing version is short. Opting in converts a reversible decision into one that costs something to reverse, for as long as the clock runs; declining the bonus leaves the deposit as ordinary money you can withdraw. That is a trade worth making deliberately, and it is why the question should I take this bonus at all comes before any arithmetic about clearing it. The structures where the trade barely arises are the 0× offers and the low-multiplier ones; what our own record holds against the 0× test is reported on the first of those two pages.

Reading an offer in 60 seconds

Read the clauses in order of how far each can move the figure. On the offer pages we have read that print these clauses at all, that is close to the reverse of the order they appear in.

  1. The base. Find the words immediately following the multiplier. The bonus against the deposit and bonus is a factor of two on a 100% match and three on a 50% one, and it is the only clause that changes the turnover total itself while the headline stays untouched.
  2. The weighting grid. Usually a small table near the end of the bonus terms. Find your game’s row and divide: 10% is ten times the volume, 5% is twenty, 0% is a wall.
  3. The multiplier. Now it is worth reading. Between 30× and 40× there is a third more work; the two clauses above this one can multiply the same requirement twentyfold and beyond.
  4. The maximum bet. A number you can set an autoplay stake under. Where the promotions page prints none, treat it as unread and go looking in the full terms.
  5. The ceiling and the clock. What clearing all of it can ever pay you is the maximum cashout cap; the expiry window turns a total into a required daily rate. Both sit outside the four numbers above, and both can outweigh them.

With those five in hand, the wagering requirements calculator converts them into a euro figure for your own deposit and your own game, and how to beat wagering requirements covers what can legitimately be done to bring that figure down.

Frequently asked

What does 35x wagering mean?

Bets totalling thirty-five times a stated base have to be placed before bonus winnings can be withdrawn, and the base is the part the phrase leaves out. On a €250 bonus, 35× the bonus is €8,750 of stakes; 35× the deposit and bonus, on the €250 deposit that earned it, is €17,500. Game weighting then divides into whichever figure applies: at a game class counting 10%, the first case asks for €87,500 of play. No offer on our record publishes 35×.

Is 35x on the deposit and bonus better than 50x on the bonus alone?

No. On a 100% match the deposit-and-bonus base is twice the bonus, so 35× against it does the work of 70× against the bonus — €17,500 of stakes on a €250 bonus, against €12,500 for the 50× version. Smaller matches widen the gap: at 50%, the deposit is twice the bonus, and the same base clause triples the requirement where the 100% match doubled it.

Do table games count towards wagering requirements?

Usually at a reduced rate, set per game class in the contribution grid the offer publishes. On the three grids we hold, BitStarz counts table, live, instant-win, lottery and bingo games at 5%; 888casino counts blackjack, roulette, baccarat and live casino at 10% with poker variants at 20% — twenty euro and ten euro of play respectively to retire one euro of requirement; and 777 runs the same four-band architecture as 888casino (both are evoke brands), with roulette and poker tables at 20% and blackjack and live tables at 10%. All three grids were read off published pages and dated on our record; the other three offers we hold publish no grid we have seen, which leaves their rates unread rather than uncapped.

Why was my bonus voided?

The terms name several routes and the arithmetic names none of them. A stake above the maximum allowed while wagering will do it; so will playing a game the offer excludes, missing the expiry window, or funding the deposit with a payment method the promotion does not accept — though that last one usually stops the bonus being granted rather than voiding one already running. One terms document on our record — the BitStarz bonus terms dated 25 June 2025 — also forfeits an active bonus once the balance falls below $0.10, and treats the deposit as locked while the bonus runs (§3.22). Only the operator can tell you which clause it applied: our record covers what the published terms say, and nothing at all about how any of them were enforced.

18+. Nothing here makes a bonus profitable — it makes the price visible, and that price is paid in stakes from your own balance. Decide your limits before the deposit and hold them through the grind. Free, confidential help: rgf.org.mt, Supportline 1777.