PayoutMalta 18+

How we rate casinos

Every verdict on this site is assembled from the same four evidence classes, in the same order of authority. When a class is missing, the page says TODO in its place — the review template literally refuses to fill those sections any other way.

The four evidence classes

ClassSourceExample
1. Regulatory recordThe licensing authority’s register (MGA or otherwise), licence conditionsLicence of record, legal entity, ADR body
2. Our test logTimestamped deposits, withdrawals, KYC runs on funded accountsMeasured payout hours in the Payout Speed Index
3. Primary documentsOperator T&Cs, provider game sheetsBonus wagering terms, default RTP values
4. Verified reader reportsScreenshot-evidenced submissions, re-verifiedReduced-RTP sightings, payout timings

Operator marketing pages are not an evidence class. They’re the thing the classes above exist to check.

What a review must contain before it publishes

  1. Licence of record — authority and licence id, linked to the authority’s register where one exists (hard gate — no verified licence, no page). You can repeat the check yourself in a minute with the licence verification guide.
  2. A completed hands-on test log: real deposit, real withdrawal, timed verification.
  3. Bonus material terms adjacent to the offer — wagering, max bet, eligible games, expiry, max cashout — never behind a “T&Cs apply” link.
  4. Payment acceptance verified per rail from a Maltese account, not copied from a cashier FAQ.
  5. A named author and a “last verified” date.

Reviews missing any of these render with visible TODO flags and stay out of the search index until complete.

Verification cadence

The commercial firewall

We earn affiliate commissions (full disclosure). The firewall is structural: measured data enters pages from the data files the test team maintains; commercial relationships have no write access to those files, no influence on the index methodology, and no veto on a negative verdict. If an operator’s numbers are bad, the numbers publish.